The economics of open source today: Hobbyist projects, independent code artisans, and managed services have changed the software market.

open source
Credit: Dreamstime

Remember when open source was all about peace, love, and Linux? When the movement was small but impassioned and fought over GPL versus BSD/Apache, free software versus open source? When seeing Linux or other open source software running in the wild was a big deal, worthy of a blog or Twitter? 

Some might pine for those good old days, but the world has moved on. Open source has become essential to how all software gets built, which comes with great opportunity and risk.

The opportunity may be obvious, but the risk often isn’t. This isn’t a question of open source being more buggy/whatever than proprietary software. It isn’t, and the process behind open source arguably makes it more likely to be secured faster when errors are discovered. No, this is fundamentally about the risk inherent in the new economics of open source, as Thoughtworks’ Ken Mugrage calls out.

Open source has changed

Early on we celebrated a lone hacker such as Linus Torvalds creating a big project like Linux and then growing a community around it. 

Other examples include Dries Buytaert (Drupal), Salvatore Sanfilippo (Redis), and more. Those were the days when hackers built open source projects for fun or as a “creative outlet” like Jens Axboe (Fio) or others. That still happens, of course, but it happens in the midst of a very different open source market.

As Mugrage highlights, early open source often tried to create an open source alternative to a big proprietary software package (think OpenOffice as a replacement for Microsoft Office or GIMP instead of Adobe Photoshop). However, “today there’s a proliferation of open source software.” 

That proliferation takes at least two primary forms: “On one side, we have internet giants churning out all manners of tools, frameworks, and platforms. On the other side, teams using OneDev, an open source software development platform, have created small but critical parts that support a huge number of businesses.”

This is great, right? We have both big and small projects fostering immense innovation. What’s not to like?

The lack of diverse contributors, for one thing, which concentrates risk. True, it has always been the case that open source software (no matter the project) is developed by a small handful of contributors. 

Although we like to mythologize open source as being about large, global communities, it’s much, much more common for it to be the work of one or two people. When community comes, it’s usually after years of success and great personal cost, as Envoy creator and maintainer Matt Klein once described to me. (Open source is a “f—-ing lot of work.”)

So that’s one part of the puzzle. Mugrage argues another point, that often “the code bases for open source packages are simply too large to allow meaningful inspection.” 

The kissing cousin to this problem of BigCo projects is that “other packages are distributed by internet titans that don’t expect anyone else to contribute to them.” The code is “single threaded” to one big entity without the ability for a community to impact development.

On the other hand, “other releases are distinct, targeted releases that may only do one relatively minor task but do it so well that they’ve spread across the internet.” See where this is going? “However, rather than an active community of maintainers, they’re often just one or two committed developers working on a passion project.”

The answer to the BigCo open source problem has tended to be “rage against the corporate open source machine,” which has largely proved futile. 

One response to such projects has been for start-ups to emerge to further support (and monetise) the project, which fixes one aspect of open source largesse with another perceived problem. The answer to independent developers creating essential but unsupported open source infrastructure has been to loudly demand that the BigCos pay to support these independent code artisans.

This suggestion is usually offered by those who simply don’t know any better. Ask people who work for foundations or other orgs designed to fund open source development, and they’ll echo what Mugrage says: “Throwing money at the problem is hardly a solution.” 

Why? Because “many open source enthusiasts who maintain their software personally while leading busy professional lives … [don’t want] the responsibility of a service-level agreement because someone paid them for their creation.”

What to do?

Hedging open source bets

Many enterprises have sought to make their open source lives easier by buying into managed services. It’s a great short-term fix, but it doesn’t solve the long-term issue of sustainability. No, the cloud hyperscalers aren’t strip miners, nefariously preying on the code of unsuspecting developers. 

But too often some teams fail to plan to contribute back to the projects upon which they depend. I stress some, as this tends to not be a corporation-wide issue, no matter the vendor. I’ve detailed this previously. 

Regardless, the companies offering these managed services tend to not have any control over the projects’ road maps. That’s not great for enterprises that want to control risk. Google is a notable exception—it tends to contribute a lot to key projects. 

Nor can they necessarily contribute directly to projects. As Mugrage indicates, for companies like Netflix or Facebook (Meta) that open source big projects, these “open source releases are almost a matter of employer branding—a way to show off their engineering chops to potential employees,” which means “you’re likely to have very little sway over future developments.” They don’t really need your contributions.

What about projects maintained by hobbyists? “Once you start looking at crucial parts of your software stack where you’re reliant on hobbyists, your choices begin to dwindle.” 

Why? Because you’re unlikely to have the time or resources to contribute code, they may not want your cash, and there are significant projects (like Log4J) where you need to rely on their projects, regardless. In this case, Mugrage suggests, just being aware of the risk via an audit of the software you depend on can be helpful.

None of this should be taken as an indication that relying on open source is unwise. Open source is inevitable and is amazingly good. Rather, the advice from Mugrage seems wise: Be aware and thoughtful about the open source you use, and plan accordingly. 

As with cloud services, sometimes the absolute correct strategy for your company is to be “locked-in” to certain services or software. The key is to make this choice with eyes wide open.


Below-average harmful algal bloom predicted for western Lake Erie

Bloom severity index for 2002-2021, and the forecast for 2022. The index is based on the amount of biomass over the peak 30-days. Credit: NOAA NOAA and its research partners are forecasting that western Lake Erie will experience a smaller-than-average harmful algal bloom (HAB) this summer, which would make ...

View more: Below-average harmful algal bloom predicted for western Lake Erie

Universal optothermal micro/nanoscale rotors

Working mechanism of light-driven out-of-plane rotation of micro/nanoscale rotors. (A) A simplified schematic illustrating the experimental setup and operation for OTER of micro/nanoparticles. (B) Working mechanism of OTER: (i) In the nonuniform temperature field, Na+ and Cl− ions and PEG molecules diffuse to the cold region. Yellow arrows indicate ...

View more: Universal optothermal micro/nanoscale rotors

RadioShack Rises From the Dead (Again) to Shill Crypto, Because Of Course

Snjivo/Shutterstock Do you ever get the urge to buy an old brand name like RadioShack and use its lifeless corpse to sell cryptocurrency? Oh, me neither. But that’s exactly what’s happening today. Retail Ecommerce Ventures, an unregulated investment company owned by Tai Lopez and Alex Mehr, is preparing to launch ...

View more: RadioShack Rises From the Dead (Again) to Shill Crypto, Because Of Course

Tesla Submits Plans to Add Massive New Structure to its Gigafactory Texas Facility

Tesla plans to construct a huge additional facility at Gigafactory Texas. Even though it is the world’s largest structure, the company sees potential to grow at the site. Tesla Requested Permission to Build Another Enormous Building in Texas The city of Austin has received a request from Tesla to ...

View more: Tesla Submits Plans to Add Massive New Structure to its Gigafactory Texas Facility

Tesla Allegedly Abuses Employees Following Recent Racial Lawsuit

Tesla is currently facing a new lawsuit filed by its own employees. According to the complainants, the electric vehicle maker allegedly abused them because of their race. Tesla Racial Lawsuit (Photo : Tesla Fans Schweiz from Unsplash)Tesla is facing another lawsuit related to racial discrimination and sexual harassment. As per The ...

View more: Tesla Allegedly Abuses Employees Following Recent Racial Lawsuit

Tesla Gigafactory Texas Expansion Request Has Been Filed! Here's How Massive the Additional Plant Is

The Tesla Gigafactory Texas expansion is now confirmed after the giant electric carmaker filed a request to the city of Austin. (Photo : Photo by SUZANNE CORDEIRO/AFP via Getty Images)CEO of Tesla Motors Elon Musk speaks at the Tesla Giga Texas manufacturing “Cyber Rodeo” grand opening party on April 7, ...

View more: Tesla Gigafactory Texas Expansion Request Has Been Filed! Here's How Massive the Additional Plant Is

Study begins to unravel the mysterious evolution of fatherless male insects

Examples of the gnats (left and middle) and springtrail (right) species used in the study. Credit: San Francisco State University It’s not often that you see genetic systems described as “bizarre” in the title of a scientific research paper. That is unless it’s from the lab of San Francisco ...

View more: Study begins to unravel the mysterious evolution of fatherless male insects

Ibuprofen tablets with flavor added survive better in space

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain Ibuprofen tablets modified to survive in space have returned to Earth and shown that those with added flavor survived better with less degradation than those with no added taste. Researchers from the International Flavor Research Center at the University of Nottingham worked with the University ...

View more: Ibuprofen tablets with flavor added survive better in space

Learning to combat DDOS attacks

Companies have a simple and legal way to help their workers living in anti-abortion states—expanding paid time off

Scientists decipher, catalog the diverse origins of Earth's minerals

Who overturning Roe hurts most, explained in 7 charts

Did You Know That Sony Walkman, the Portable Cassette Player, Hit the Shelves on This Day in 1979?

Govt may launch national malware repository; to create robust cybersecurity regime

Indian unicorn heads meet British PM Boris Johnson; discuss India-UK collaboration

Chinese game developer miHoYo, creator of Genshin Impact, sues Minmetals trust firm in a case of speculative investment gone bad

eBay's Fourth of July Sale Includes Deals on Home Decor, Kitchen Gadgets, Tech and More

How to find marker genes in cell clusters

Here are the most effective things you can do to fight climate change

How reindeer eyes transform in winter to give them twilight vision


Top Car News Car News